Warning: Illegal string offset 'name' in [path]/includes/functions.php on line 6570
Reviving An Old Debate..... - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Reviving An Old Debate.....

  1. #16
    Post Monkey Piano's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Antarctica
    Posts
    217
    Points
    108.50
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Yes, VLC media player (recommended for x264) supports Win, Mac and most builds of Linux without having to install codecs.
    Alright, Linux have VLC Media Player by itself. Macs can use QuickTime. But Windows still need to install a player. We can take this into consideration without installing any codec but player.

    Should we start doing H.264? Need some talking..
    Banned from being a VP Member for Giving out Dump Access to Non-VP Members

  2. #17
    P.I.M.P. chooks's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    782
    Points
    565.41
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Being a Mac user, I'd rather use VLC than Quicktime because QT doesn't like some xvids/avi's. VLC will play these no worries so I just stick with the one player - VLC. (For my VP mpg's i use QT though, it's easy because it's set as the default player for them).

    You could always offer both formats like the current mpg/m2v options.
    I Didn't Say It Was Your Fault, I Said I Was Going To Blame You.

  3. #18
    Videopimp Members crash's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Deutchland
    Posts
    1,820
    Points
    944.97
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Yep. I agree. Lets just have x264 as an additional video format on top the current mpg and m2v formats. Then, everyone will be happy.

  4. #19
    Post Monkey hamed_ostovar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Guilan
    Posts
    220
    Points
    110.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by crash View Post
    Yep. I agree. Lets just have x264 as an additional video format on top the current mpg and m2v formats. Then, everyone will be happy.
    I did some videos with x264, The size avrage was 70-80 mb. I think it's a big size for download.

  5. #20
    Post Monkey hamed_ostovar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Guilan
    Posts
    220
    Points
    110.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    personally, I don't like H.264. It's good but just for archiving source files.

  6. #21
    Videopimp Members crash's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Deutchland
    Posts
    1,820
    Points
    944.97
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hamed_ostovar View Post
    personally, I don't like H.264. It's good but just for archiving source files.
    Is H.264 the same as x264? My ipod supports H.264 videos.

  7. #22
    Post Monkey hamed_ostovar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Guilan
    Posts
    220
    Points
    110.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by crash View Post
    Is H.264 the same as x264? My ipod supports H.264 videos.
    hey hey I don't know shit about x264 .. The format I worked with,
    was h.264

  8. #23
    Post Pimpest

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Needs moar sauce.
    Posts
    520
    Points
    270.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hamed_ostovar View Post
    hey hey I don't know shit about x264 .. The format I worked with,
    was h.264
    First off, I don't like that kind of profanity on these forums. Hah jk.

    Also, x264 compresses to about the same size as XviD, but it yields much higher quality then XviD, which is why it is superior.

    H.264 is a quicktime format I believe, unless your talking about an AVC .mkv container.

  9. #24
    Videopimp Members Frenchy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    534
    Points
    371.63
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Ok Time for school noobs.. :P
    H.264 is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 10
    and the software encoder x264 is used in most instances.

    While MPEG-4 ASP is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 2
    and most software encoders used in this instance is XviD or DivX.

    Therefore x264 > XviD

    as for containers go .mkv is Matroska's container and IMHO the greatest
    but with no standardisation it hasn't received any support on consumer hardware.
    eg. DVD Players which feature DivX.
    Matroska is completely open source and easy to use.

    Also note that H.264 IS x264.
    VideoPimp.org Capper
    frenchy@videopimp.org
    PSN ID: Frenchy182

  10. #25
    Post Monkey hamed_ostovar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Guilan
    Posts
    220
    Points
    110.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Ok Time for school noobs.. :P
    H.264 is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 10
    and the software encoder x264 is used in most instances.
    While MPEG-4 ASP is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 2
    and most software encoders used in this instance is XviD or DivX.
    Therefore x264 > XviD
    Also note that H.264 IS x264.
    Thanks Frenchy. It was complete.

  11. #26
    Videopimp Members crash's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Deutchland
    Posts
    1,820
    Points
    944.97
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Ok Time for school noobs.. :P
    H.264 is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 10
    and the software encoder x264 is used in most instances.

    While MPEG-4 ASP is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 2
    and most software encoders used in this instance is XviD or DivX.

    Therefore x264 > XviD

    as for containers go .mkv is Matroska's container and IMHO the greatest
    but with no standardisation it hasn't received any support on consumer hardware.
    eg. DVD Players which feature DivX.
    Matroska is completely open source and easy to use.

    Also note that H.264 IS x264.
    The master is here to enlighten us.

  12. #27
    Post Pimpest

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Needs moar sauce.
    Posts
    520
    Points
    270.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Ok Time for school noobs.. :P
    H.264 is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 10
    and the software encoder x264 is used in most instances.

    While MPEG-4 ASP is a codec for video compression or MPEG-4 Part 2
    and most software encoders used in this instance is XviD or DivX.

    Therefore x264 > XviD

    as for containers go .mkv is Matroska's container and IMHO the greatest
    but with no standardisation it hasn't received any support on consumer hardware.
    eg. DVD Players which feature DivX.
    Matroska is completely open source and easy to use.

    Also note that H.264 IS x264.
    I feel like a n00b...

    Matroska is very popular with HD videos, because of it's compression rate. Although in order to play them, you have to either download VLC (which sometimes doesn't work with them) or you have to install ffdshow which has just about every codec you could ever want in one package.

  13. #28
    Videopimp Members crash's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Deutchland
    Posts
    1,820
    Points
    944.97
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BHead View Post
    I feel like a n00b...

    Matroska is very popular with HD videos, because of it's compression rate. Although in order to play them, you have to either download VLC (which sometimes doesn't work with them) or you have to install ffdshow which has just about every codec you could ever want in one package.
    I recommend that you get k-lite codec pack. Just google it.

  14. #29
    Post Pimpest

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Needs moar sauce.
    Posts
    520
    Points
    270.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crash View Post
    I recommend that you get k-lite codec pack. Just google it.
    Ironically that's what I have installed! I forgot that that is the codec pack. LOL!

  15. #30
    Post Monkey hamed_ostovar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Guilan
    Posts
    220
    Points
    110.00
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    k-lite codec pack is a great one.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •